Quality on Talentack is not a badge we hand out. It is the sum of small, checkable things: a profile kept current, tools named honestly, references who can speak to a specific project, and availability that matches what the person actually works. This page collects how we think about that, and what we ask of profiles before they are worth a recruiter's time.
Quality on Talentack is not a badge we hand out. It is the sum of small, checkable things: who wrote the summary, when the availability window was last updated, whether the references still pick up the phone. These are the questions we get most often from candidates and hiring managers alike.
The person themselves. We do not rewrite it into recruiter language or pad it with keywords. A short paragraph in the candidate's own voice tells a hiring manager more about how someone thinks than a polished third-person bio.
Profiles carry a visible last-updated date. If a window has gone stale, it shows. We would rather a candidate mark themselves unavailable than have a recruiter send a brief into a void, so the field is easy to change and hard to forget.
Someone who can speak to a specific piece of work: a former client, a studio lead, a project manager. Three referees who know the details of what you delivered hold up better than ten names who only remember you were on the team.
No. We do not issue scores or rank people against each other. Seniority bands are self-declared and the portfolio strip is the evidence. Hiring managers read the work and the references, then decide for themselves.
A recruiter browsing by skill cluster or work setup sends a brief straight to your profile. No inbox queue, no agency middle layer. You see the scope, the timeline and the setup before you decide whether to reply.
Most people run one and keep it current. Freelancers who split their time between, say, front-end work and illustration sometimes keep two, each with its own portfolio strip and task list, so a brief lands in the right place.
Still weighing whether a profile is worth the upkeep? The help pages walk through setup, and you can reach the team through contact if something here is unclear.
References on Talentack are checked, not collected. When a hiring manager asks for a referee, we expect that person to have worked with the candidate on something specific, in the last few years, and to be reachable. The quotes below come from people who have either sent a brief through the directory or stood as a reference for someone listed on it.
"I stopped asking for a CV. The profile told me the tools, the availability window and who to call. That is the whole first call, done before the call."
Hiring manager, product team, Cape Town
"I was asked to stand as a reference for a designer I had worked with two years earlier. Because her profile listed the project and the exact role she played, I could answer the call in five minutes instead of guessing."
Studio lead, Johannesburg
"Three referees who can speak to outcomes beat ten names I have to chase. That is the standard here."
Freelance developer, Durban
"The availability field saved a whole round of emails. I knew before writing the brief whether the overlap worked."
Operations lead, Pretoria