Profile notes

Writing a profile that survives a recruiter's first pass

What hiring managers in Johannesburg actually scan for in the first twenty seconds

Published 14 March 2025 · Reading time about 6 minutes

Recruiter reviewing candidate profiles on a laptop at a desk

Shortlisting rarely starts with a portfolio link. It starts with a scroll: role focus, tools, availability, references. A recruiter in Rosebank or Century City is usually working through a shortlist on a second screen while a brief sits open in another tab. The profile that answers the obvious questions first tends to keep its place.

Role focus is the first thing read and the first thing skipped when it is vague. "Creative professional" tells a hiring manager nothing. "Mid-level front-end developer, React and TypeScript, four years agency side" gives them a decision. Seniority band matters here too, because a brief written for a senior hire will not slow down for a profile that hides its level in a paragraph.

Tool lists are where most profiles quietly lose points. Naming twenty tools reads as padding; naming five that you actually used on shipped work reads as evidence. Hiring managers in Cape Town often say the same thing: they want to know which tools carried a project, not which ones appeared in a tutorial.

Availability comes next, and it is usually misread. A window like "weekdays, 09:00 to 17:00 SAST, hybrid in Durban" answers the real question. A paragraph about being flexible answers nothing. Keep it short, keep it current, and update it when a contract ends.

References sit at the bottom of the reading order, but they are the field most likely to be checked once a brief moves forward. Three names with context beat ten names with none. A short line on what each referee worked on saves everyone a round of email.

The plain-language summary is the part candidates underestimate. A rewritten CV paragraph reads like a CV paragraph. A summary written in the candidate's own voice, with one concrete project and one honest limitation, tends to hold a reader longer than a polished third-person bio.

Related reading

Two follow-ups that pick up where this piece stops.

Notes from the shortlist

Three pieces written for people on both sides of a hiring brief. Each one takes a single field on the profile and pulls it apart: what gets read first, what gets misread, and what a recruiter does with the answer once they have it.

Recruiter reviewing candidate profiles on a laptop at a desk

Profile hygiene

Writing a profile that survives a recruiter's first pass

Most shortlisting happens before anyone opens a portfolio link. This piece breaks down the order in which recruiters read a profile: role focus, tools, availability, then references. It looks at how vague tool lists and padded project histories slow a reader down, and why a plain-language summary written by the candidate tends to outperform a rewritten CV paragraph. Includes notes from hiring managers in Johannesburg and Cape Town on what makes them stop scrolling.

Read the piece
Freelancer working from a home desk with a notebook and laptop

Availability

Availability windows and the remote setup question

Availability is one of the most misread fields on a freelance profile. This article looks at how to phrase working hours, time-zone overlap with European and US clients, and hybrid versus fully remote setups in a way that answers the recruiter's real question. It also covers how to mention infrastructure realities like backup power or connectivity without making them the headline. Examples are drawn from profiles across Durban, Pretoria and Cape Town.

Read the piece
Two colleagues in conversation during a reference call

References

References that hold up when a brief gets serious

References are usually the last field filled in and the first one checked when a brief moves forward. This piece covers how to pick referees who can speak to specific project outcomes rather than general character, how to give them enough context to answer a call or email, and how often to refresh the list. It also touches on the etiquette of asking a former client or studio lead to stand as a reference after a long gap.

Read the piece